Assessing the Economic Contributions of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Asian OIC Countries

Authors

  • Muhammad Soleh Hambali Faculty of Economics and Business, Accounting, University of Mataram
  • Saipul Arni Muhsyaf Faculty of Economics and Business, Accounting, University of Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v10i3.612

Keywords:

Islamic banking, conventional banking, economic growth, GDP growth, GDP per capita growth

Abstract

This study explores the differential impacts of Islamic and conventional banks on economic growth within Asian member countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Utilizing a dataset of 1,846 observations from eight OIC countries, panel regression techniques are employed to assess the effects of these banking models on key economic growth indicators: GDP growth and GDP per capita growth. The analysis reveals that Islamic banks have a significantly greater positive impact on both GDP growth and GDP per capita growth compared to conventional banks. The findings highlight that Islamic banking principles, such as risk-sharing and asset-backed financing, contribute to a more stable and inclusive financial environment, enhancing overall economic development. The results underscore the importance of promoting Islamic banking alongside conventional banking to foster sustainable economic growth. Policymakers and financial regulators should consider incorporating the strengths of Islamic banking into regulatory frameworks to improve financial stability and resilience. Future research should investigate the long-term impacts of Islamic and conventional banking on economic growth across different regions and economic conditions, as well as the interplay between regulatory environments and financial sector performance.

References

Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2000). A new database on financial development and structure. World Bank Economic Review, 14(3), 597-605.

Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 433-447.

Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175-212.

Chapra, M. U. (2000). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective. The Islamic Foundation.

Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2001). Financial structure and economic growth: A cross-country comparison of banks, markets, and development. MIT Press.

Greene, W. H. (2018). Econometric Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.

Hasan, M., & Dridi, J. (2011). The effects of the global crisis on Islamic and conventional banks: A comparative study. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 2(2), 163-200.

Iqbal, Z., & Mirakhor, A. (2007). An Introduction to Islamic Finance: Theory and Practice. John Wiley & Sons.

Khan, M. S., & Mirakhor, A. (1987). The framework for an Islamic financial system. World Bank Working Paper.

King, R. G., & Levine, R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 717-737.

Levine, R. (2005). Finance and growth: Theory and evidence. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol. 1A, pp. 865-934). Elsevier.

Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Principles of Economics (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Mishkin, F. S. (2019). The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets (12th ed.). Pearson.

Naceur, S. B., & Omran, M. (2011). The effects of bank regulations, competition, and financial reforms on banks' performance. Emerging Markets Review, 12(1), 1-20.

OSIRIS Database. (2020). Bureau van Dijk.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.

World Bank. (2021). World Development Indicators

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Hambali, M. S. ., & Muhsyaf, S. A. . (2024). Assessing the Economic Contributions of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Asian OIC Countries. JURNAL SOSIAL EKONOMI DAN HUMANIORA, 10(3), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v10i3.612