PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITUR DALAM PINJAM MEMINJAM UANG YANG BERBASIS ONLINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v8i1.31Keywords:
Online loans, Legal relations, WanprestasiAbstract
The purpose of this research is to find out legal relationship regarding the rights and obligations of the parties in carrying out online-based lending and borrowing agreements and to find out the legal settlement in the event of a default in the online lending and borrowing implementation. The approaches used in this research are: the statute approach, the conceptual approach, the Historycal Approach, and all of the data were collected using literature study techniques and analyzed normatively. the provisions of the online-based lending and borrowing agreement cannot be separated from the legal terms of the agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, besides that in practice the parties also adhere to Article 1338 of the Civil Code which makes the agreement a legal basis for them and POJK Number 77/POJK.01 /2016. Legal protection for parties in the implementation of online-based lending and borrowing includes preventive legal protection as well as repressive legal protection. In the legal relationship of the parties, if there is a default or dispute, the parties in the event of a default or dispute, the parties can resolve it in two ways, namely through litigation and non-litigation
References
Ahmad Ardity, A. 2021. YLKI sebbut pinjaman online menagih pinjaman di luar aturan, https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/ylki-sebut-pinjaman-online-menagih-pinjaman-di-luar-aturan YLKI Sebut Pinjaman Online Menagih Pinjaman di Luar Aturan, diakses tanggal 30 November 2021.
Andini, G. 2017. Faktοr-Faktοr Yang Menentukan Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Usaha Mikrο Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) Pada Lembaga Keuangan Mikrο Peer tο Peer Lending, Skripsi. FEB, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.
Basrowi. 2019. Analisis Aspek dam Upaya Perlindungan Konsumen Fintech Syariah. Jurnal Lex Librum, 5(2): 959-980
Hariyani, I. 2017. Perlindungan Hukum dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Jasa PM Tekfin. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(3): 345-348.
Harahap, M. Y., 1986. Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian. Alumni: Bandung.
Hidayat, M. 2021. Satgas temukan 133 fintech lending illegal baru hingga awal Januari 2021, https://www.liputan6.com/tekno/read/4471041/satgas-temukan 133-fintech-lending-legal, diakses tanggal 31 januari 2021.
Hikam, H.A.A. 2021. Kepastian hukum bagi para pihak pinjol, https://www.detik.com/tag/ojk, diakses tanggal 23 Desember 2021.
Husni, L., 2004. Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Melalui Pengadilan dan Diluar Pengadilan, cetakan Pertama. Raja Grafindo: Jakarta.
Istiqamah. 2019. Analisis Pinjaman Online Oleh Fintech Dalam Hukum Perdata, Jurisprudentie, 6(2): 291-306.
Kadir, M. A., 2009. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Ed. 1, Cet. 15. PT Raja Grafindo Persada : Jakarta.
Muchsin. 2003. Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum Bagi Investor di Indonesia, Tesis. Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
Supramono, G., 2013. Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam, Cetakan Pertama. Kencana Prenada Media Grup: Jakarta.
Wahyuni, R.A.E,dkk. 2019. Praktik Finansial Teknologi Ilegal Dalam Bentuk Pinjaman Online Ditinjau Dari Etika Bisnis. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3): 379-391.
Widijowati, R. D., 2012. HUKUM DAGANG, ed. 1. CV. Andi Offset: Yogyakarta
Peraturan-Peraturan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang Pinjam Meminjam Secara Online.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ida Bagus Gilang Paramartha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.